Sunday, March 10, 2019
In Of Mice and Men Steinbeck presents a totally pessimistic view of life where dreams offer the only escape? Essay
Guys like us that engage on ranches atomic number 18 the l bingleliest guys in the worldwith us it personalt like thatbecause I got you to olfaction after me, and you got me to look after you. Perhaps of Mice and Men can be perceived as a totally pessimistic reflection of what bearing in 1930s America was like, but with the extraordinary human relationship between George and Lennie and the natural dignity of Slim, a balance between the unplayful and the bad, the happy and the unhappy is chance ond.The parent-child relationship shared between George and Lennie throughout the romance is certainly a good thing. From the start of the novel, we see George as a responsible character, a parent substitute to Lennie, whose loyalty seems more than through kindness than a sense of duty. He reminds Lennie that (his) aunt Clara would like (him) trail off by (himself) and til now when he is severely provoked by Lennie to speak harshly to him, he soon feels guilty and apologises I been mean, aint I?. Lennie, on the other hand, acts like a child, insensible of the hardships he and George face throughout the novel. He pleads with George to let him keep the rats he finds and needs George to repeat to him row and phrases so that he can look on them Lennieyou remember what I told you? Lennie raised his elbow and his face contorted with design.Yet although George is Lennies opposite, he continues to care for him throughout the novel, even at the end when he chooses to end Lennie life himself rather than experience him suffer under the wrath of Curley Lennie dies at the hand of the man he trusts, still believing in his dream, painlessly, happy and free Lennie jarred, and then colonised slowly forward to the sand, and he lay without quivering.But possibly it is this dream that makes this novel seem so pessimistic it is what seemingly keeps them unitedly yet at the end it is shattered, and with it, George and Lennies partnership comes to a shocking end. The drea m is of a very small farm, a little outer space, which they own themselves, a dream of working for themselves and of being the ones in arouse If we dont like a guy we can set up Get the hell out, and by God hes got to do it. It is powerful enough to draw in Candy and, temporally, even the distrustful Crooks. Yet although this dream offers an escape from reality and even when the hope of license seemed possible, it is shattered and George is left with no other option but to lend up his one and only ally in the struggle against a union which finds it difficult to imagine than one can go for a friend to share his fears and sorrows with I never see one guy take so much trouble for anotherPerhaps Lennies finis is down to fate and destiny, the fact that neither he nor George had any oblige over their lives, as reflected by Slims tender words at the end of the novel, You hadda George. I swear you hadda, or maybe it is in fact down to the rootless American society of the 1930s.S o to conclude, although George and Lennies friendship and Slims natural dignity are deuce good things, Lennies death and the collapse of the dream he and George believed in at the end of the novel leads one to feel that, during the Depression, freedom and conquest were perhaps impossible to achieve. The American Dream, the key to American psychology, utter that great personal success could be gained by hard work and private success. Yet in truth many were not allowed to achieve this success. Such groups included itinerant workers and Black people who, in this novel, are represented by Crooks, a character openly referred to as ringtail, which exemplifies the casual racism directed towards him by the others and although the ranch hands do not set out to insult him deliberately, the use of the term jigaboo signals to us that black men like Crooks were constantly degraded both(prenominal) verbally and physically by whites.The storys heart-rending conclusion leads one to realise tha t for most migrant workers, the reality of their social situation meaning that the American Dream cannot be realised. This truth is reflected by the famous running game of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, both Italian immigrants who realised the true force of societys bias in the 1920s. Sacco and Vanzetti were convicted of the murder of a paymaster and his guard and the robbery of $15,776 from the woodlouse and Morrill Shoe factory and were later executed for their disgusts.From the evidence and the obvious diagonal feelings toward immigrants, the case became one where their culture was on trial as unconnected to their actions and thus they were bound to be found guilty. Instead of upholding the sacred discriminative process cemented in the United States Constitution, the conviction of Sacco and Vanzetti resulted from the prejudice and discrimination of old-stock Americans in the 1920s. For Sacco and Vanzetti, their time was not an age of reason in American history. As bo th were guilty and proudly so- of a cultural crimeMy conviction is that I have suffered for things I am guilty of. I am suffering because I am a radical and so I am a radical I have suffered because I was an Italian, and indeed I am an Italian I have suffered more for my family and for my beloved than for myself but I am so convinced to be right that if you could execute me ii times, and if I could be reborn two other times, I would live again to do what I have done already.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment