1984 by George Orwell: Challenging Relationships and Power Play

1984 by George Orwell explores the challenging relationships between antithetic sets of postplay. It ultimately maneuvers subordinates into positions where it is able to hold power against them, shaping the wants and thirsts of the powerless. The common aw atomic number 18ness of this engage of power is nil, as any maven struggles to be the arrant(a) party member, yet as individuals, the desire to hold what is beyond their grasp calls them, and members of the public strive to find the pieces of their independence.Orwell places a normal character into a world where every aspect of life is dominated by a power so indestructible, anticipate created is scarce. The protagonist, Winston, is concerned with individual freedom and expression, and these both takes control his journey through with(predicate) the book. Winston struggles to collapse his individuality, with the knowledge that the moment he began to discover from the public thought, he was a utterly man. Winston hold s onto desire, writing in his journal towards the set-back of the text, If there is hope, it lies in the proles. The unsatisfying humans hits Winston the moment he realises the proles (short for proletarians, the lowest correct in this society) are of no hope at all. The statement, that the proles can be allow intellectual liberty because they have no intellect , brings the truth to light. If we view the integral lower class in 1984 as one individual, it portrays the helplessness of the proles against the Party, against Big Br new(prenominal), the big powers of society.The manner in which Winston describes the lower classes, it is non difficult to view them as one whole, one more character in the text. Another failed idea of hope is that of the young generation. Often used in other texts as a positive careen in regime, 1984 turns the children into the armours of betrayal, abandoning even their own families to the belief Police, as Parsons children do to their father wh ile he sleeps. By creating a situation which mocks reasonable hopes, 1984 alludes to the issue of vulnerability of the individual once again.This chaff is similar to that in the poem Ozy Mandias by Percy Bysshe Shellie, who creates an irony through change in history. The persona declares I am Ozy Mandias, ability of kings/ look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair These two lines place the next, which simply states Nothing else remains . well(p) when a power thinks it can save even God, shown through the capatilisation of the M in Mighty, time destroys his works, divergence 2 vast and trunkless legs of stone standing in the desert . Although the irony is cutely dissimilar in technique, the emphasis remains in the power driven manners they are obtained. Through the systematic indoctrination of the children in 1984 to uphold Big Brother for the future, leaving no hope of change, so in like manner does Shellie through writing this poem preserve the legacy of OzyMandi as. And so sure is Ozy Mandias that his image pass on survive that of Gods, so too is modern societys hope in their children. This irony leads the individual on, leaving the reality of the situation too deep to escape it.