The Handmaidens Tale and 1984 Essay Example for Free

The Handmaidens fib and 1984 EssayThe governance activity has the righteousnesseous duties to be a national defense for its citizens, to act as an governance of justice in providing law and order for its peoples, and to provide certain human beings goods and function to its people though in these present epochs, the government fails to provide certain necessities to its citizens. The dickens books scripted in a standardised century, both(prenominal) George Orwells 1984, and Margret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale, display how the government can use ferocity as a promoter of keep in line on its people. In 1984, the government controls its citizens lives through with(predicate) manipulating the language of Oceania Syme, who is Winstons colleague at the Ministry of Truth, was a lexicographer who developed the new dictionary of the Oceanic language Newspeak. Also, similar in type, in Margret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale, the government in Gilead uses policies that regulates an d controls its womens desires for internal activity the government acts in such a way, because the government has a procreative agenda in Gilead.To conclude, the government in both these novels uses violence as a means of coercive its citizens. In 1984, and The Handmaids Tale, both the citizens of Oceania and Gilead realise their language distorted this is in order for them to be infringed from certain goods and services. This language alteration is more or less evident when Syme informs Winston (the main protagonist in 1984) that by 2050, no individual will be qualified to picture their conversation this meaning that the government of Oceania wants to control its citizens thoughts.This context can be understood when Syme is in a low-ceilinged canteen deep underground, and he refers to the beauty of the governments means of controlling the local vocabulary, saying Dont you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? Has it ever occurred to you, Winst on, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a iodin human being will be alive who could look such a conversation as we are having now? The whole temper of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now.Orthodoxy means not thinkingnot needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness (Orwell, pg. 68). This name elucidates to the Big Br new(prenominal)s tame plan in narrowing the range of thought to the Newspeak it states that totally human beings will not understand the conversation they are having, because the universal lexicon will devalue the purpose of thought. The fact that Syme uses words and phrases such as thought will be different, there will be no thought, and, Orthodoxy means not thinking, implies that the government of Oceania will infringe on the citizens right to the freedom of thought.Not exclusively does the government of Oceania control the public through changing the vocabulary, only if this happens also in the gove rnment of Gilead. This language manipulation is nearly evident when Offred was walking to the shop, and she noticed the written letters on the shop had been painted out, describing, Almost all written words any(prenominal)place have been removed, steady the shops have had the lettering painted out, when they decided that even the names of the shops were too much for us. Now places are known by their signs alone (Atwood, pg. 1). This quotation refers to how the written words have been removed out of the language, in order for the government to control its citizens from certain services such as literacy. In this quotation, the words and phrases such as all written words anywhere have been removed the lettering painted out, and, places are known by their signs, means that the government has change the language so much, that the citizens can only understand the important sections of the city, and not have the freedom to look its vicinities.In this paragraph, it is clear that the g overnment uses the manipulation of the local lexicon, subsequently infringing on the rights of its local citizens. In the other novel, 1984 written by George Orwell, the citizens of Oceania experience another form of control, which is the violation to rights of privacy.In this novel, Winston Smith described the conditions in the public square mentioning that if an individual showed any miniscule sign of deceitfulness, then the government would arrest the vile immediately, saying, It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or inwardly range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a enclothe of muttering to yourselfanything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper port on your face was itself a punish fit offence.There was even a word for it in Newspeak facecrime (Orwell, pg. 79). In this quotation, Winston Smith refers to the Big fellows legislative policies in which telescreens would be set-up in order to have control over its citizens. From the precedent using words and phrases such as terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen, the smallest thing could give you away, and, improper expression on your face was itself a punishable offence, shows that it is even dangerous to express the slightest sign of abnormality in front of the telescreen.Not only does the government in Oceania violate the right to private and public privacy, but that in the government in Gilead the same occurrence ensues. This governmental violation of the right to private and public privacy, is most evident in the gymnasium, where Offred larn who to susurrus almost without making a sound, explaining, We learned to whisper almost without sound. In the semi-darkness we could stretch out our arms, when the Aunts werent looking, and tou ch each others hands across space.We learned to lip-read, our heads politic on the beds, turned sideways, watching each others mouths. In this way we exchanged names, from bed to bed Alma. Janine. Dolores. Moira. June (Atwood pg. 4). In this quotation, the handmaids exchange names through lip reading and through whispers. Through the words and phrases such as, learned to whisper almost without sound, learned to lip-read, and, In this way we exchanged names, means that because they had to lip-read and whisper, this shows the reader that the handmaids have no privacy to exchange names.In this paragraph, it is noticeable that the governments legislation and policy mitigates the right to privacy. Furthurmore, in the same novel, 1984, it can be seen that the government subjugates its people from sexual activity. In the novel, Winston fantasizes about making live with Julia as she travels across the field, saying, The girl with dark hair was coming towards them across the field. With wh at seemed a single movement she tore off her clothes and flung them disdainfully aside.Her body was white and smooth, but it aroused no desire in him, indeed he scantily looked at it. What overwhelmed him in that instant was admiration for the intercommunicate with which she had thrown her clothes aside. With its grace and carelessness it seemed to annihilate a whole culture, a whole system of rules of thought, as though Big Brother and the Party and the Thought Police could all be move into nothingness by a single splendid movement of the arm. That too was a gesture be to the ancient time (Atwood, pg. 0). In this quote, Winston Smith dreams about Julia taking off her clothes as she runs across the field. Through the author using words and phrases such as, she tore off her clothes, he barely looked at it, and, Big Brother and the Party and the Though Police, shows that as Julia takes off her clothes on the field, Winston Smith barely looks at her body due to the Big Brother and the Parties legislation for the elimination of sexual promiscuity.Not only does the government in Oceania take away the right to sexual activity, but that the government of Gilead also infringes on the right to sexual interest. This governmental infringement can also be seen in the Handmaidens tale through Offred who makes it clear that throughout the narrative, she is apart of a collectively owned resource. She describes her tattoo as four digits and an eye, a passport in reverse. Its supposed to guarantee that I will never be able to fade, finally, into another landscape. I am too important. I am a national resource. (Atwood 65).This quote said by Offred of her describing her tattoo acts as a symbol of the tattoo itself that the government subjugates its people from sexual activity that they would desire and that women are only used as a resource to repopulate. In conclusion, the two narratives in which were written in a similar century, both George Orwells 1984, and Margret Atw oods The Handmaids Tale, clearly use their book as a means of foretelling the future of a partnership monopolized by corruption from future technology by displaying how their government uses violence as a means of control over its people.